Written by Anna Stavropoulou, philologist-text editor
I have been following Dr. Alemis as his editor and as a reader since 2010. In his books and articles, he speaks simply, clearly, with square logic and a laser-like gaze. Many times what he says causes shock, because it seems somewhat unrealistic, somewhat harsh, somewhat unpopular, somewhat or very uncomfortable. The truth is inconvenient, that's true. But let's go and look at some of his positions over time and how they are evaluated now, in light of the revelations about the Epstein dossier.
A. Conspiracy theories
In the book of "Political Systems and Their Relationship to the Economy and Freedom", and in the chapter "Why the "educated" don't believe in the existence of conspiracies, from the first edition, in 2013, says:
"Are conspiracies real? To answer this question, all we need to do is look to history; we will see that the real, raw history is a collection of conspiracies. Then why do people mock conspiracies and deny their existence? This is part of the element of secrecy. If people knew about the existence of some great secret that would affect their lives and that some people had undertaken to carry it out, then by definition this could not be a conspiracy. Because, if a conspiracy of democracy were known and obvious, then the citizens would stop it in the upcoming elections.
However, here I would like to emphasize that most conspiracies are not that secretive. The most successful conspiracies are those that are almost obvious, but have extremely good public relations behind them.In other words, “many” know about them, but the public relations mechanism used by the conspirators presents the whole thing from a positive perspective, hiding anything negative about it.
In this vein, Hitler had said that the best conspiracies are those that are overt, but their evil side sounds so incredible that it would be impossible for rational people to believe it. For example, most Germans knew about Hitler's plan for the Jews and had been informed about it. Many of them agreed that it would be good for Germany, but they did not want to know the details.
If they had done a little research, they could have discovered what was really going on. Because what was being done was not done by Hitler himself at night, but by hundreds or thousands of his followers, who also had thousands of friends and relatives who would have known at least part of what was really going on in the concentration camps. So the concentration camp conspiracy was not particularly shrouded in secrecy. But it was so incredible what was happening that the average rational person could not comprehend it; so they did not believe it, or rather did not even want to look at it.”
Epstein's role was not to offer little girls and maybe little boys to rich tycoons, it was a conspiracy operation to put them in charge, a blackmail operation, let's say. That was his goal, not sexual orgies for pleasure.
B. Lack of response
The ability to look something straight in the eye is a trait of intelligence, and Dr. Alemis lists it as trait No. 28 in the book of "Intelligence - Its 65 Characteristics" (28. The intelligence of coping skills), where he states:
“Coping is the ability to see and accept something as it is without distorting what one sees by wishing it were different from what it is… One’s inability to see things around one as they really are is the most dangerous of all the characteristics one can have.”
See how dangerous this is and where it led to the Epstein issue: from the ruined lives of children to the ruined economies and national sovereignty for the benefit of others.
[CONTINUED IN PART B]
Photo By Palm Beach County Sheriff's Department – Palm Beach County Sheriff's Department [1][2], Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=185442934, https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/
