A statement in the European Parliament has once again brought to light a dark chapter in modern geopolitics. According to what was said — clearly and publicly — the United States' decision to "not touch the East" was not accidental, but was part of a long-standing agreement, which began already asking NATO to examine since the time of Bill Clinton.
What does this mean for Greece? What does it mean for Cyprus? For Thrace, the Aegean, the Mediterranean?
Why do our so-called "allies" maintain a respectful silence when it comes to Turkish provocations, drilling, invasion of sovereign territories, and demographic change through mass migration?
Behind closed doors
The reference to agreements "not to harm the East" shows that the powerful in the West have chosen for decades to leave vital space in Turkey, in the name of greater strategic balances. This means:
- Silent tolerance in violations and expansionist ambitions
- Support or neutrality on critical issues for Greece and Cyprus
- Insistence on “Turkish stability” against Greek sovereignty
Where is Greece in all this?
The voice of Greece is heard only when is there public pressure or external interestGovernments are silent, diplomacy moves passively and the people feel helpless in an abandonment strategy.
Can a small country rise to prominence? History says “yes.” It only needs to know the truth.
How much do we still not know?
This position in the European Parliament is not just a snapshot. It is a reminder that our national issues are not decided only by Athens or Brussels, but from agreements, alliances and "silences" that were made decades ago.
From the journalistic team of Greek News and Radio FL
photo Image license by freepik.com, wirestock
