Written by sergioschrys
If the Great and Saint, as well as Equal to the Apostles, Constantine, is the true reformer of the Greco-Roman Empire, the "..."Great" Charlemagne is his opposite, that is, the copyist, the false saint, the deceiver and the usurper!
The West has always been made up of barbaric and plundering peoples. And these peoples have one thing in common: They are of GERMAN origin and provenance. They tried to copy the greatness of Romania by having as their leader a usurper, swindler and pseudo-saint as a role model, while Romania had a truly GREAT man and visionary!
*It is dedicated to the two friends, brothers and fellow competitors, known as “Diodotos” and “ErgDimErg” |
From the first day that Rome was captured by the German Vandals of Giserich in 455 AD, History turned a page. Ancient Rome, which bore the brunt of the greatest sin for the bloodbath it caused through the genocide of the early Christians, fell into the hands of the most barbaric Germanic people that had appeared at that time, if one excludes Attila's Huns.
Western Europe, I have repeatedly emphasized, it is the creation of barbarians, ruthless and with wild instincts people, who put nothing else before their instincts. People who sought blood and plunder, despite the fact that they were Christianized and this explains why over the centuries, they created a Christianity to their liking.
For these German peoples (Goths, Vandals, Lombards, Franks, Saxons), who conquered all of Western Europe, enslaving all of its indigenous peoples – mainly the Romanized Celts and Gauls – there is nothing but theft, plunder, immorality, hatred. They were not capable of creating culture, of creating ethics. They were not even capable of creating humanity.
These peoples, who to this day occupy Western Europe and more generally what we call geopolitically "West", have no connection with either God or "universal culture"His."
This is how they learned to live since ancient times, this is how they live today, having the exact same instincts, which they simply hide, wearing the cloak of "Humanism", as they perceive it, in contrast to the East, which produced not only Culture, not only Ethos, but also nobility that stems from the sense of Freedom of the Spirit, respect for Man and his rights. as well as a vision for the future of Humanity.
The hatred of Westerners towards the Greek Romans
If it is assumed that Humanity has indeed given birth to great political, social and religious figures of men and women, These were first and led by Alexander III of Macedonia and Constantine I of Rome.
Both, descendants of the Greek nation, changed the course of human history and laid the foundations for the Greek spirit to prevail throughout the then known world, as well as for the Word and truth of God to be established.
Alexander, on the other hand, who united all the Greek tribes which until shortly before his time were divided and quarreled among themselves and, turning them towards their true enemy, which were the Persians, created the then Greek Oikoumene through the Hellenization of the peoples and opened the way for the incarnate Divine Word to sprout and spread everywhere.
And Constantine, he reunified the Roman Empire, divided by his predecessor emperors, by moving the capital of the state precisely to the point that Alexander described as the meeting point of the East with the West and, with the help of Divine Grace, he paved the way for the consolidation of the Divine Apocalyptic Truth that Christianity advocates.
These two Great Men, the West separated them in terms of their greatness. He deified Alexander. because it represented the greatness of Ancient Greece, which according to them during the Renaissance and Enlightenment was…non-existent and therefore “harmless”, and Constantine was bitterly slandered and humiliated to such an extent that he not only blamed him for all the "sins" of the Papacy, but also for the fact that he RESURRECTED Hellenism (the Greeks according to the Frankish version) through his act of establishing a new Capital in the Greek world and establishing Christianity through the first Ecumenical Council..
There are no historical bigger lies from these.
Firstly, because these slanders were extracted through the ahistorical lies of pagan Zosimus, who wrote about Constantine was completely unsubstantiated and secondly, the "Enlightenment" of the 18th century, because they wanted to end Christianity once and for all, brought Zosimus out of oblivion and took full advantage of his lies, without even bothering to refer to other historians of Zosimus' era (5th century AD) or, better yet, to contemporary historians of the 4th century, who lived through the era of Constantine closely.
Although Zosimus was characterized by official History as being exaggerated, myth-mongering, and unreliable, he nevertheless became the…symbol for the “Enlighteners” (mainly Gibbon) to substantiate their theory of…complete exposure of the “traitor” of the Greco-Roman ideal(!!!)
Apart from Zosimus, no one else wrote anything bad about this Great General, Saint of Orthodoxy and Visionary. I should note that until 810 AD, the Papal See commemorated Constantine as the founder of Christianity. Today, the Papacy itself does not even want to hear about him.
On the other hand, there is the famous Charlemagne or Charles I the GreatThe unofficial address to Charlemagne as the Great was the "work" of Pope Victor II (1057 AD), while the official one was given by the also famous Edward Gibbon or Gibbon in his work “History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire”, who not only does not accept the historical continuity of the empire through Constantinople, but at the same time In his epilogue, he extols the role of Charlemagne as the regenerator of the concept of the Roman ideal, in contrast to Constantine who…sold it out to the “Greeks”.
But where did this...great Charlemagne come from? Let's see it in as few words as possible.
During the 8th century AD, the Franks were dominant in Western Europe, but... divided and often fought among themselves. They also considered the Eastern Roman Empire, which was the superpower of the time, to be the greatest threat to their interests., fearing that the Easterners would one day attack one of their kingdoms (as they did in the past with the case of the Ostrogoths during the reign of Justinian I) to bring Western Europe back into their own geopolitical influence.
Charles, as the son of the Frankish king Pepin the Short and his successor, conceived the idea of uniting all these states into one, as a contrast to the eastern state of Romania.
And so, almost 20 years after assuming power due to the death of his father (he co-reigned with his brother Carloman for a time) he managed not only to unite all the Franks, but also to expand his state throughout western Europe.
Goes on
source / photo: https://www.pirinoslogios.com/post/ / PyrinosLogios
